Combined Effort Equals Success

In the past decades, as technology became morein the long run it facilitates the group work process
and more important and frequently used in theand project management. Executive and
commercial world, the shape of our daily businessmanagement staff should also provide employees
processes have drastically changed. Companies havewith benefits or incentives to encourage groupware
expanded, opened offices in various locations aroundimplementation and usage. Researches have
the world, outsourced their work to cheaperexamined social factors in the adoption of groupware
countries and created remote or tele-working jobs.tools and came to the conclusion that mandated use
The colleague you work with or your projector executive measures seemed to be necessary.
manager might not be located in the cubicle next toThese high-level mandates might be received with
you, but several thousand miles across the globe.mixed responses, but groupware will be used. Besides
This did not only change our business opportunitiesthe management, it is up to the groupware designers
but also our work processes and how projects arewho must find a way to make sure the application is
managed. Almost all projects require cooperationperceived as useful for individuals even outside the
between various departments or multiple persons.context of full group adoption. In many cases
Employees traveling around in different countries stillcollaboration is at odds with the company's corporate
need to access information and must be reachableculture so implementation will be disruptive and
by their colleagues. A variety of technology solutionstherefore shifting the corporate culture from being
have been utilized for this purpose, such as remotecompetitive to being cooperative is no a small
connections to the intranet, storing data on externalundertaking and will require changes at all levels of
drives or e-mailing corporate data back and forththe organization.
between employees in various locations. However,The second hurdle that needs to be considered when
this was not the most efficient way of data sharingplanning to implement groupware is the potential lack
or managing projects.of interoperability/compatibility. Many groupware
In order to achieve an efficient cooperation, dataapplications fail, because anyone who wanted use the
sharing and communication between various projectsystem efficiently needed to have the same
groups and locations had to be as productive astechnology in place, otherwise it would not work. A
possible. For this purpose various groupwaregood example is instant messaging (IM). The user can
applications, also known as collaborative softwareonly use IM, when the other party is using the same
have been developed. Groupware are powerfulsystem such as AOL IM or Yahoo. These
software applications that support new ways ofcompatibility issues lead to general wariness among
work by providing efficient tools to solvecustomers, who in general wait to see what standard
"collaboration oriented" tasks. It allows a close and inemerges and which technology becomes the most
most cases, real-time cooperation and communicationpopular.
between several people on a single valuable businessAn alternative to groupware that allows similar
project from different locations. This technology alsofunctionalities and features has been and still is the
allows members to work on different but correlatedintranet. Intranet is a technology that has been used
tasks, share documents, information, and data byby corporations for a much longer time than
allowing them to essentially work on the same pagegroupware and is focused on a less formal
at the same time, without creating duplicate ideascommunication and the distribution of relatively
and work. Many extra groupware features includeunstructured information. Files and data uploaded to
group calendars that are used to schedulean intranet are not very well structured, the search
videoconferencing meetings, multi-player games usingcapabilities might be limited and tracking of document
live video and chat to communicate, newsgroupchanges is not as efficient as groupware solutions. In
discussions as well as document change tracking toaddition to that it is very hard to manage
allow for easy identification of who is working on the"simultaneous" work, as such extensive collaboration
latest revision of the project.features are not very supported. The loose structure
With these new technological advances andof the intranet allows to stimulate the creative use
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)of corporate communications and the diffusion of
environments such as Lotus Notes and Microsoftknowledge. But at the same time they are not
Exchange it allows for tasks and business processesdesigned to facilitate the management of data,
to get done more efficiently and faster by using alldocuments, and document-centered transactions
required human resources, even when not in thewithin a distributed environment as groupware
same location. The advantages of a groupwaresolutions do.
system in comparison to a single user system areIn addition to that, groupware applications obey strict
mainly when working in a project environment whererules and produce precise types of results. But an
communication is essential between collaborators.intranet application, must allow for "accidental
Groupware allows for and facilitates a much fasterencounters and unpredictable outcomes". Accordingly,
and clearer communication where it would notthe application development tools associated with
otherwise be possible and is built so that every singlegroupware are tightly integrated with the product
user can benefit from the advantages of groupware,itself and seem to be highly developed than those
by allowing for multiple perspectives, expertise andused with intranets. Intranet tools are typically
assistance with group solving. Project managers andgeneric, open, and unfocused.
executives can generate various reports for trackingThere certainly are enough advantages as well as
and monitoring the status of business projects,disadvantages when implementing groupware
resources, and departments. At the same timesolutions, but at the same time, our constant
business project managers can use the robusttechnology development is taking away the location
benefits of groupware to increase revenue, reducebarriers, which allow us to work in much larger
meeting times, boost customer satisfaction anddimensions and without boundaries. In order to
minimize operational costs.maintain the technological advantages we have and
Although there seem to be only benefits inuse them efficiently for business opportunities,
groupware, the probably two biggest hurdles withcorporations are forced to implement systems that
implementing it is the failure of achieving the criticalallow an easy, fast and efficient way in getting the
mass of users and the lack interoperability orwork done, staying in touch with employees,
compatibility of systems. When planning to implementbusiness partners and contractors all over the world.
groupware successfully, it means achieving the criticalKeep corporations more organized and unified in this
mass of users. Typically a groupware system will notglobal business environment is one of the biggest
suceed unless most or all of the target group is willingtasks managers have to face and only groupware
to use it and adopt the system. In contrast, a singlesystems provide a solution to this dilemma. A solution
user application can be sucesfull even if only a smallthat allows employees to collaborate on information,
portion of the target group adopts it (Brink, 1998). Aideas, and many other facets of their work and allow
difficult task which IT managers as well as executivethem to be more effective, productive, and
staff need to face is convincing people to useorganized. Much research has been done and shown
groupware. This can only be done by providing thethat if efforts of each individual in an organization are
required training to make people comfortable using it.combined, the greater the achievements will be and
If people don't feel comfortable with the system orthe more success the organization will have in the
do not see a benefit in it, they won't use it, even iflong run.